Yahoo! Services

Account Options

New User? Sign Up Sign In Help

Yahoo! Search

Music Blogs

The Golden Road: Reconsidering The Grateful Dead

Posted Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:55am PST by Michael Goldberg in Rock's Backpages

The news that surviving members of the Grateful Dead are set to tour again--as "The Dead"--prompts us to haul Michael Goldberg's reappraisal of the Haight-Ashbury jam-meisters out of the RBP vaults...--Barney Hoskyns, Editorial Director, Rock's Backpages

In my dream, my high-school buddy Toby was working at a record store, in what appeared to be the present. (Toby never worked in a record store, and these days he produces documentary films and books about jazz and blues artists.)

He was behind the counter, and we were talking about the Grateful Dead, a band we had both liked when their first album, The Grateful Dead, was released in 1967. We went to see them perform in San Francisco on a number of occasions in the late '60s and early '70s--including a concert at the Carousel Ballroom and a free show in Golden Gate Park.

In the dream, Toby had re-listened to the group's music (I guess because The Golden Road box set was just released) and found it wanting. He told me that now, all these years later, it didn't sound so good.

I was surprised. I started to make excuses for it. I defended The Grateful Dead. Toby persisted, telling me that, well, they weren't a very good band.

I haven't spoken to Toby in a few years, so I don't know what he really thinks about the Dead at this point in his life (since the early '70s he's become an expert on jazz and blues, two genres that he truly loves). I do know that I've begun dipping into The Golden Road, and have thus far listened to four of the set's 12 CDs. In real life, as in my dream, I dig the music of the Grateful Dead. I always thought that the Dead didn't get the credit they deserved for their '60s and early-'70s studio recordings (which I've always loved), and I think this box really demonstrates their contribution to the culture as a recording band. I think the music contained in this set--recordings made between 1965 and 1973--represents the best of the group's recordings. That may have something to do with more than just the music.

I probably first heard of the Grateful Dead when I saw their name on the psychedelic dance posters advertising shows at the Avalon Ballroom and Fillmore Auditorium. These posters, some made by the San Francisco-based (at the time) artists Wes Wilson, Stanley Mouse and Alton Kelley, were fresh, adventurous, and in some cases almost magical. They implied a new world, one I'd been reading about in newspaper and magazine articles.

This underground, bohemian world--Victorian apartments, longhaired dudes in mod-cowboy garb and women in antique gowns or outfits evocative of another era--was one of extreme creativity, tied together by new and untried social experiments, drugs that could transport you to another zone and the experimental rock music of the day. As a young kid just entering my teens, that was my view at that time of the mid-to-late '60s counterculture.

The Grateful Dead's debut album, with its cover art by Mouse and Kelley, allowed me, in my middle-class suburban bedroom in Marin, to actually feel some of this new world that I yearned to enter (but couldn't, as a 14-year-old). I think that for both Toby and myself, the music of the San Francisco bands--the Dead, Big Brother and the Holding Company, the Quicksilver Messenger Service and others--was our way out of a boring middle-class life that we didn't want in our futures.

These days, when I start talking to someone about the Dead, I usually preface my remarks by saying, "Now I'm not a Deadhead, but...." In other words, I'm saying, it's not that I'm obsessed with the Grateful Dead like all those folks who used to follow them around. No, I can coolly, objectively, speak of their music. Which is not really true. How can I really speak objectively about music and a band that had such a profound impact on me? When I listen to their music, I experience more than just the music.

The Dead, ultimately, were as D.I.Y. as any punk band that came before or after them. They ended up with their own label, and probably had more success with it than any other artist. They did things their way from the start, and were both unconventional and antiestablishment. Their albums made no concessions to the marketplace. It is no surprise that Greg Ginn of Black Flag was a huge fan--he once told me in the mid-'80s that he thought Black Flag should open for the Dead.

Why, in my dream, was Toby so adamant about the Dead's music--the music they made 30 years ago, when I was still a kid--not cutting it any more? Perhaps Toby, in the dream, represents the part of me that thinks I should "grow up", that I should have outgrown the music of my youth by now. Why do I think that'll never happen?

Read dozens more Grateful Dead interviews and reviews at www.rocksbackpages.com. Over 13,000 articles by the greatest writers from the finest rock publications of the last 40 years.

8 Comments

1. DUDE -
Age is a funny thing...Some grow to different musical areas,while others maintain a connection to early influences...Hopefully,with Warren Haynes onboard,The Dead can further their legacy.

2. __A_YAHOO_USER__ -
DUDE said most of it for me.

I dig what you say, and this was a nice blog. Personally, I think the GD just hit a major chord with most people, and that's why its hard to let them lose...too many good memories.

3. RiderFan -
I own a couple of the GD albums - they're OK. The songwriting isn't as good as Dylan, the instrumentation isn't as golden as The Band (neither are their harmonies), the guitar solo's are certainly not the height of the 60's. They aren't as cool as CSN&Y, not as furious as Neil Young, and certainly not as wierd as Jefferson Airplane.

I always feel bad that I don't like them as much as some people. I really wish I could, but I just can't.

4. DennyRules -
Having never seen (fact is, I've never wanted to) the Dead live, my take on the band is strictly musical. As a result, I think lots of other bands have done the jazz-thing better; 1000's have done the country-thing better and the Dead never have really "rocked out." Garcia was probably a talented guitarist/musician, but his incessant noodling always got on my nerves. Restraint may not always dawn on those stoned out of their minds, I guess.

Probably what I liked least about the Dead - aside from their stoner-freak persona - is the jug-band angle they played. Jug-band music never struck me as being as interesting as either country or bluegrass, but the Dead seemed to think it was the greatest thing since liquid LSD. Especially if it was stretched out with faux-jazz doodling and played for wall-eyed audiences.

I suppose the greatest irony surrounding the Dead is the fact that, because of their association with hallucinogens & the psychedelic experience, these guys - who are now genuinely old (or literally dead) and who sound even older - appeal to college-age kids. Crazy . . . but I never bought in to it.

5. dadav -
The Grateful Dead's music is barely comprehensible to those of use who don't smoke our breakfast. Every GD fan I've ever know was a stoner. So, if you only like to listen to music while your brain is chemically altered or you're a major fan of Volkswagen Jetta's, ignore the GD and eventually they'll go away or, at least past out of your consciousness. I've had happy years of my life where I never once thought about the GD. Ah, sweet memories bloom!

6. Stuart -
The Dead on tour? This sounds like an attempt to cash in and pad their retirement accounts like other geriatric acts (i.e. the Rolling Stones). Let's see how many potheads and aging hippies turn out and pay the price of admission to see these geezers noodle endlessly.

7. Ann -
Ok. Anyone writing here born after 1987 just does not get it. The Dead took 3 minute folk-jugband-bluegrass ditties and stretched them into half hour mind bending sonic journeys. Nobody did that before. Not the Byrds, not the Airplane, not the Blues Project. And with few exceptions, one song would eventualy meld into something else which flowed into something else and how we all got there was the TRIP. Even without Owlsley. (Is that how you spell his Name?) In the beginning, the very beginning, the Dead "noodled " their way from song to song. Such practice allowed Jerry and the boys to become master practitioners of improvising. It was great when it worked and frustrating when it didn't, even to the band. But they learned how to improvise and go where the Muse took them. The great guitar duo solos of the Allmans were rehearsed over and over, much like Coltranes "a Love Supreme", while the Dead just went soaring or boring off. The new "Dead" cashing in? I don't think so. They're just musicians who want to play with their friends for as long as it works. And I think it will. BTW, the Dead weren't my faves back in 1967, that was reserved for James Gurley and Sam Andrews freak-out with Big Brother and the three guitar attack squad in Moby Grape. Steveland off the Waves.

8. Jose -
I was born in '86 and have the utmost respect for the Grateful Dead and many other bands of that era. As a musician myself I have learned much about improvisation from this group of ultra talented musicians. And while they may have had off nights out of the thousands of shows that they played they also had many more transcendental moments. Being a drug addict who is living sober and working on my recovery I can still turn on some GD and it can transport me to that magical place, COMPLETELY SOBER. If you want to say that this band caters soley to mind altered potheads you should take a look at all music across all spectrums. Having worked worked at many concert venues in my late teens into early twenties I noticed the majority of those in attendance were drinking heavily or using drugs of all kinds, this is just something that music (being a mind altering substance of its own) draws to it. Anyways though I've been listening to The Golden Road on lala.com and I love the early recordings. Fans of The Grateful Dead should also check out www.archive.org
Leave Your Comment
You must sign in to leave a comment
Select a Blog Posts
New This Week
by Dave DiMartino
123
Reality Bites
by Jordan Gracey
38
Reality Rocks
by Lyndsey Parker
578
Rock's Backpages
by Philip Norman (1970)
191
Sound Check
by Yahoo! Music Canada
27
Stop The Presses!
by Us Magazine
85
That's Really Week
by Lyndsey Parker
124
The Blender Burner
by Blender Magazine
27
The MOJO Blog
by Bill DeMain
88
The NME Blog
by Luke Lewis
48
The Spin Blog
by David Marchese
77
The Ten
by Andy West
9
Video Ga Ga
by Lyndsey Parker
70

Lambert says he got carried away, but not sorry

AP
Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:00am PST

AP - Adam Lambert admits he got carried away with his sexually charged American Music Awards performance, but he's offering no apology. The glam rocker from "American Idol" said on "The Early Show" t… More »

More News Stories