Yahoo! Services

Account Options

New User? Sign Up Sign In Help

Yahoo! Search

Music Blogs

Coldplay Vs Joe Satriani: The Verdict!

Posted Mon Dec 8, 2008 12:39pm PST by Mat Snow in The MOJO Blog

Plagiarism, legal lunacy, or just a case of two useless applications of one duh-obvious idea? MOJO's Mat Snow decides...

With the end of the world as we know it rattling all four sets of hooves, it was reassuring to learn that, even in these uncertain times, where there's a hit, just as surely there's still a writ. Last Thursday Joe Satriani filed court papers in LA claiming that Coldplay's hit "Viva La Vida" used "substantial original portions" of his 2004 instrumental If "I Could Fly." The stunt-guitarist wants a jury trial and is seeking damages and "any and all profits" for the alleged plagiarism. In this day and age, where everybody is just a premium-rate call or text away from having a say, why stop with just 12 angry men? We all want our two cents. Let the court rise...

Exhibit A: the monster mash: Unusually for a set of fingers famous for fizzing down the frets, Joe was slow to punch his lawyer's number. His fans, however, have been on the case since June when not only was the resemblance between his 2004 tune and the Coldplay hit noted in blog posts, but a smart alec mashed the two tunes together (to get them exactly in sync, Coldplay were speeded up to borderline Chipmunks pitch) and uploaded it to YouTube, with upgrades to follow. Good game!

But did Coldplay actually, to use that terrific Swiss Army knife word for disreputable deeds, ‘jack' the Satch's track? Let precedent be our guide...

Grand theft auto?: In 1969, John Lennon paid tribute to one of his all-time heroes, Chuck Berry, by adapting the first line of the future bathroom voyeur's "You Can't Catch Me" for the first line of his own "Come Together" ("Here come old flat-top, he come grooving' up slowly") on The Beatles' Abbey Road, a tip of the titfer from a disciple to his master which acknowledged a groovy classic and enriched the tradition without impoverishing the original by so much as a cent in financial or cultural credit. And how did Chuck's publisher, Morris Levy, respond? By proving copyright law an a** with a suit which forced Lennon to record a whole album of tunes from his catalogue. Fortunately, that album was the wonderful if currently unfashionable Rock 'N' Roll.

But with Satch vs the world's second-favourite U2 soundalikes (after U2), we're not talking one line. We're talking the entire chord progression and basic melody--like the man says, "substantial original portions".

Self-abuse?: Twenty years ago John Fogerty found himself suing his own be-denimed a** for plagiarism when his old Fantasy label boss, Saul Zaentz, submitted that the new Fogerty tune, "The Old Man Down The Road," ripped off an old Fogerty tune, "Run Through The Jungle" by Creedence Clearwater Revival, a Fantasy recording. Armed with his guitar, the Fog took the stand to demonstrate to the jury that while a cloth-eared money-grubber might not be able to distinguish one choogling tune from another, people who actually bought records surely could. Fogerty won (and lost).

Sadly, in the current instance, I could find no proof that "Satch" and the band who seem to have inspired no affectionate nicknames whatsoever among the fans (not even "The Coldies" or "The Play") are one and the same.

The sweet Lord's inspiration?: Tunes--they come out of thin air, don't they? So said George Harrison when accused by the publishers of The Chiffons' "He's So Fine" of copying the gal-group classic for his Krishna-worshipping global smash "My Sweet Lord." No dice, son, said the US federal court. Likewise Rod Stewart's unsuccessful defence of his hit "Da Ya Think I'm Sexy" against a plagiarism suit from Brazilian musician Jorge Ben Jor proving its derivation from his song "Taj Mahal."

When the law establishes the legal similarity of one song to another, the copyright-owner of the second song has little defense against charges of copying from the first, however far removed the artists are in genre and circumstance. So even if you cannot imagine Keith Richards sitting down to enjoy the wistful Sapphic elegance of K.D. Lang, you can't deny the possibility that he might have half-cocked an ear to her 1992 hit "Constant Craving" if his missus had it on the kitchen radio when he popped to the fridge for a fresh blood transfusion. Hence the Stones' forestalled any legal action just before the release of their 1997 single "Anybody Seen My Baby?" by cutting in lang and co-writer Ben Mink to the credits, a simple courtesy and painless payday that moved Kd to declare herself "completely honored and flattered".

The verdict: It doesn't look good for the British Grammy hopefuls. Sure, the idea of Coldplay guitarist Jonny Buckland bending a studious ear to a Satch album and deliberately copping his tune sounds far-fetched. But that's no defense in law. Copying doesn't have to be conscious, still less cold-blooded. Coldplay's best tactic might be to admit that "Viva La Vida"'s chord sequence is embarrassingly bog-standard, and the melody follows it with all the inevitability of the bleeding obvious. In other words, second-rate musical minds might easily and innocently think alike. But if I was on that jury of hard-working joes plucked from honest jobs (if they've still got ‘em) to decide between a self-made all-American trick-bag axeman and a bunch of atheist Brits whose stock in trade is making marriage to your very own Gwyneth Paltrow the recipe for unending and lucrative miserabilism, well... need I say more?

The sentence: Fortunately, the American fondness for litigation is matched by their judicial creativity in apportioning redress. Checked out that mash-up yet? If the Coldplay tune is one of the most half-arsed in a long and dreary list of forgettable worldwide Number 1s, Satch's "If I Could Fly" is no Beck's Bolero either. But jam them together and you have a full and glorious arse of a record to stick in your iPod next to Tom Petty's "Free Fallin'" and Boston's "More Than A Feeling." Make ‘em do it, your honour, with proceeds to the charity of Satch's choice. Justice is blind, but no reason for it to be deaf.

Visit www.MOJO4music.com to commune with fellow music maniacs...

18 Comments

1. Yahoo! Music User -
It's kind of sad that this only happens when one song is a hit. If this coldplay song tanked, no one would give a crap. There have been countless songs that sound similar, but when there's no pay day involved, you never see a lawsuit.

2. __A_YAHOO_USER__ -
Post-Grunge bands should start suing ea/ other. They all sound amazingly the same...boring.

3. Big DMC -
I'm with Joe it is a ripoff!

4. Samudra -
yes i like you joe satriani ..,your is the best

5. MsSchadenfreude -
I agree with the first commenter.

Grunge bands won't sue each other anytime soon seeing as how they didn't sound the same and that time has passed. Nice try though.

6. Brandon Thomas -
Being a songwriter is a sensitive thing as any job is to someone that takes pride in it. Anyone with half a brain cannot deny that the melodies are nearly exact between the 2 songs. It doesen't matter if it's only a portion or not.

And as far as this only happening because Coldplay is (lol) grammy nominated and made millions off this record? Well....OF COURSE it would make you want to take action even more. 1. because you deserve and want credit for what you created and 2. Because clowns like Coldplay are making more money for something you created.

7. Derrick W -
joe wrote joe should get paid for these stupid ass bands..joe is one of the greatest guitarist to ever pick up the instrument..

8. __A_YAHOO_USER__ -
Get 'em Satch

9. K -
joe is the best guitarist ever , he better win his case.

10. Edward -
can we now have bruce Sprinsteen Sue the Kings of leaon for ripping off Dancing in the Dark with Sex on Fire ??

11. kenya r -
i am coldplay fan and honestly it is very commom for artist to sample each others music,especially unsubconciously.

12. Taylor -
Unsubconciously? Pretty sure that's not a word.

13. Lindz -
Honestly its like twenty seconds of the song that sounds remotely similar (and the song is like 6 and a half minutes long). The whole rest of the song sounds nothing like Viva La Vida at all. There are plenty of songs that sound similar these days; I'm sure Coldplay did not intentionally copy anything.

Also, many people keep saying that if Satriani wins he will donate to charity, but a lot of what Coldplay does is give a ton of money to charity so people also need to stop acting as if Coldplay are selfish, rich, snobs who don't care about others.

14. Yahoo! Music User -
The history of modern popular music is full of broad daylight pilfering. A songwriter hears a lick or a chord progression or a line of lyric in another’s song and thinks, “Hmm, what if I took that and rearranged it a little?” It happens all the time. In fact, beneath most artistic endeavors, there is a magpie spirit. Painters, novelists, movie directors - they all stand on the shoulders of those who came before them, referencing previous works, filtering influences and ideas through their own unique styles. But because of its limitations - twelve notes, harmonic simplicity, a handful of basic rhythms and a lyrical palette that deals primarily with matters of the heart - pop songwriting has more shared DNA than any other art form (and that’s without even delving into the area of sampling). In the Coldplay-Satriani case, there is a similarity, but I'd be very surprised if the court ruled in favor of plagiarism.

15. DOUGLAS -
Satriani shoudl be sued by The Jefferson Starship. HE is the one who stole that riff from their tune "Hearts".
Just listen to it and there will be no argument.
Sorry your CD's don't sell as many as Coldplay Joe...But like The Barenaked LAdies said "It's all been done".

16. Atom -
The odds that they didn't steal that melody are slim to none.
Mathematically speaking, it's next to impossible.

17. Lionheart -
I hope Joe wins it. Coldplay is all good an all but Joe Satriani is he greatest guitarist to ever pick up the guitar. He is close to being a future Hendrix. Joe wrote each of his songs for the music is contains not the money is was worth. Coldplay just wrote the music for money, then they realized it was a grammy-nominated award then they leaped for joy that Viva La Vida is worth soo much now. I'm with Joe on this case. What artist takes another persons music who wrote it with pride and wins an award for it. thats just wrong.

18. Solo -
Neither song is a timeless master piece worth wasting tax payer money or tying up our courts. The song is in a different key, tempo and yes it is similar but so is a million other songs that we listen to everyday. I think Joe is a great guitarist but I also think is trying to get something for nothing. Joe, your song is just OK and as a fan, I am a bit turned off by this frivolous law suit. I was more of a Satriani fan than I am a Coldplay fan.....
Leave Your Comment
You must sign in to leave a comment
Select a Blog Posts
New This Week
by Dave DiMartino
123
Reality Bites
by Jordan Gracey
38
Reality Rocks
by Lyndsey Parker
578
Rock's Backpages
by Philip Norman (1970)
191
Sound Check
by Yahoo! Music Canada
27
Stop The Presses!
by Us Magazine
85
That's Really Week
by Lyndsey Parker
124
The Blender Burner
by Blender Magazine
27
The MOJO Blog
by Bill DeMain
88
The NME Blog
by Luke Lewis
48
The Spin Blog
by David Marchese
77
The Ten
by Andy West
9
Video Ga Ga
by Lyndsey Parker
70

Lambert says he got carried away, but not sorry

AP
Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:00am PST

AP - Adam Lambert admits he got carried away with his sexually charged American Music Awards performance, but he's offering no apology. The glam rocker from "American Idol" said on "The Early Show" t… More »

More News Stories