Yahoo! Services

Account Options

New User? Sign Up Sign In Help

Yahoo! Search

Music Blogs

Five Performers Who Take Too Long To Make Music

Posted Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:28am PDT by Rob O'Connor in List Of The Day

While some people just seem to pour new songs, others seem to always have something better to do. This is because they have so much money, they don't need to record. Like, is Garth Brooks even in the music business anymore? Not that I'm complaining, mind you.

There are plenty of obscure people who take forever to record a follow-up album. I always assume it's because when they come home from their day out in the fields picking cotton, they don't feel like recording. But what's the deal with these five bozos below?

My Bloody Valentine: They recorded an album called Loveless several decades ago that people who listen to music say was a revolutionary work. It looked shiny. But then work began on the follow-up, or work didn't begin on the follow-up, or work is going to begin on the follow-up. The only problem now is that most of the band's original fans are now dead. Or working long hours and don't have time anymore and now only listen to...(roll the Paul Simon song....)

Paul Simon: Yes, Paul Simon, the man who started the trend of taking years between albums.  Or at least that's how I see it. Used to be you put out a record every year without fail, sometimes even two, just so people wouldn't forget who you were. Now the Who were excellent at taking forever with albums no one could understand once they bought them, but Simon actually started recording his albums while on vacation. Imagine how different his music career would've been if he vacationed in Florida like most normal people!

Guns N' Roses: To be fair, most of the guys either quit or were fired or whatever you want to believe. The other guys make albums from time to time. But Axl Rose just keeps doing whatever it is that Axl Rose does. Braid his hair? If Chinese Democracy ever comes out, go directly to your bomb shelter and wait out the end of the world.

U2: I know Bono is busy saving the world from itself and offering Red electronics to anyone who needs a new calculator/phone/portable dry cleaner and blender, but originally his job was to be the pompous doofus leading a band of guys with funny haircuts. With music, he would stop war, cure disease and end famine. Eventually the group started making music that didn't all sound alike. But not enough people bought it, so they went back to sounding like their old selves and continued to win Grammys and wear cool sunglasses.

Metallica: The best part of the Metallica film Some Kind Of Monster was reading stuff like "Day 734: Recording St. Anger." Admittedly, it must be hard cutting an album when your lead singer shows up at noon and has to pick the kids up at four. While these guys paid some psychologist a ridiculous amount of money to express their feelings, they would've benefited more from a "Time Management" Coach who could teach them how to get something done.

57 Comments

1. Ash -
U2 does take a long time to record, but I'm looking forward to their album in (supposedly) late 2008. Another band who takes a spectacularily long time to record are the Beastie Boys. They need to go faster! :)

2. lets make believe -
it doesn't help when a band comes out with an album, then releases a live version, a cd/dvd version, a two bonus track version, a special packaging version, a remixed version, and a greatest hits album (featuring all the songs you're already sick of) before coming out with a brand new, full-length, studio album.

3. Mrslamont -
What's the prob with taking too long? So much nonsense is out here now because I believe artists are just trying to make paper. With these artists, it's more to the milk than the cow it came from...

4. Daddys little girl... -
i cant stand u2....they are way to political...they used to be good in the 80s then they went to be activists...save the whales, save tibet, save bengldesh. save africa..save monoglia...why not...Save your music..write good stuff and less trying to save the world...U too R.E.M

5. Xena -
i loved guns n roses .. but axl has gone crazy.. and u2 is good they are actually helping the world instead of being like paris or those other fake millionairs that live off theyre parents money

6. __A_YAHOO_USER__ -
Grow up "little girl". The world does not revolve around you and your needs. U2 is doing a decent thing supporting our planet, which, by the way, is the blue planet that you live on. Try thinking of something else other than your self for once. Besides, I doubt you really know what good music even is.

7. Louis -
if i may add to the list...

saosin. and recently the offspring.

all other choices are very true. axl takes forever with everything

8. Shane -
Re: "U2 too political now..."

They were political in the 1980's, what do you think "Sunday Bloody Sunday" was about (1983), "New Year's Day" (1983)

Live Aid (1985),

They've been political since day 1.

9. Yahoo! Music User -
Tool is definitely a band that needs added. Possibly 3 Days Grace too.

10. nick w -
Nine Inch Nails also needs to be on the list. There were approximately 86 years between their last two non-remix/original albums.

11. Yahoo! Music User -
MBV's original fans are dead? Not bloody likely. The people who bought Loveless when it came out are in their late thirties, you imbecile.

12. TheSwaner1995 -
and i think you should count maroon5 because it took a while in between songs about jane and it wont be soon before long

13. Yahoo! Music User -
Most MBV fans overdosed years ago. In desperation, depression and overall frudstration. Kevin Shields didn't realize what he started and didn't finish.

14. RowR -
Oh man...have you heard of the word quality? If I have butt loads of money that will let me live forever without even have to lift a finger in working, I could take my time and let me creative juices flow in their appointed time.

15. Travis -
Portishead took 11 years to put out their newest CD. Dummy Came out in 1993, Portishead in 1997 and Third in 2008. And it's nbot like they took time off either. They actually spent 11 years working on the album! Had a listen. It was worth the wait.

16. iversam -
thats funny this tard doesnt make a top ten list and no one reads it...oh and how about DR DRE....tard

17. Jeb -
I think you forgot one here: Peter Gabriel. I love his music but the decade or so between albums is too much!

18. Yahoo! Music User -
what about 'Boston'?

19. leroyh -
U2 is saving the world? If Bono would stop spending so much time spreading garbage political rhetoric, he could donate 10% of his net worth to buy seeds and the continent of African could feed themselves.

20. Nite Owl -
More idiotic opines from Rob O'Connor.

U2 is NUMBER ONE BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Page:  1 | 2 | 3 
Leave Your Comment
You must sign in to leave a comment
Select a Blog Posts
New This Week
by Dave DiMartino
123
Reality Bites
by Jordan Gracey
38
Reality Rocks
by Lyndsey Parker
578
Rock's Backpages
by Philip Norman (1970)
191
Sound Check
by Yahoo! Music Canada
27
Stop The Presses!
by Us Magazine
85
That's Really Week
by Lyndsey Parker
124
The Blender Burner
by Blender Magazine
27
The MOJO Blog
by Bill DeMain
88
The NME Blog
by Luke Lewis
48
The Spin Blog
by David Marchese
77
The Ten
by Andy West
9
Video Ga Ga
by Lyndsey Parker
70

Lambert says he got carried away, but not sorry

AP
Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:00am PST

AP - Adam Lambert admits he got carried away with his sexually charged American Music Awards performance, but he's offering no apology. The glam rocker from "American Idol" said on "The Early Show" t… More »

More News Stories