Yahoo! Services

Account Options

New User? Sign Up Sign In Help

Yahoo! Search

Music Blogs

The Ten Artists Most Deserving Grammys

Posted Thu Feb 5, 2009 9:08am PST by Rob O'Connor in List Of The Day
Ok, the Grammys are what they are. A way for the business to celebrate itself and to heck with the rest of us. I don't actually care who gets them, but for a moment let's pretend we care. And if they were going to do this thing right, they'd award artists for their best work, not their latest work. Granted, hindsight is 20/20 and maybe the folks of the Academy really did think they had a winner with Christopher Cross, a man who would one day be as influential and important and remembered as Otis Redding. Well, if not wrong, they were less than right.

I went over to the Grammy site and typed in a handful of names to see what would come up. And what I found was pretty much what I expected, but a little worse. If the Academy (I love the seriousness of such a thing--the Academy) was able to recognize the Beatles in 1964 as the Best New Recording Act, shouldn't they have been onto them throughout their career?

Anyhow, here's a random ten of major artists who never received the Grammys they deserved (again, suspending our belief and pretending this stuff matters):

10) The Doors: How is it that a band with a singer as serious as Jim Morrison didn't win over the voters of the Academy? They love these kinds of guys, from Sting to Bono to Radiohead. I guess the Academy caught Jimbo's drunk act and decided that for all the "Greek God" comparisons, there was always a chance they'd get nothing more than a fat, sweaty Ralph Kramden drunk to show up to their ceremony.

9) Pink Floyd: Nothing for Dark Side Of The Moon. Nothing for The Wall. But they win in 1994, Best Rock Instrumental Performance with "Marooned." Ah, yes, that's the one keeper in their catalog. WHAT? It's like we should all just get drunk and make up the rules as we go along and then maybe something like Ummagumma would have a chance of winning.

8) Led Zeppelin: Nah, a hard rock band. Pass. Give it to Jethro Tull instead. Or maybe the Moody Blues. I read somewhere that they played pretty loud. But, wait, Led Zeppelin are threatening to reunite without their lead singer. Hmm, they might put them right in line for an award NEXT YEAR. Doncha think?

7) Janis Joplin: Again, it really shocks me when someone dies young and the Academy doesn't find a way to pay tribute. You'd think with all the "better late than never" possibilities that await them with JJ that they'd get moving on her. She's still got a lot of fans and surely Norah Jones would have a few nice words to say about her and could perform a mellow tribute if they need something uncontroversial. It's there, people.

6) The Who: You mean to tell me that with all Pete Townshend's ambitions, he still never qualified to win one of these things with his band? He won something in 1993 for "Best Musical Show Album" for the "Original Cast Recording" of Tommy. Not the original album. It's like you wonder if everyone at the Academy just sits there and tries to think of what the most ridiculous way would be to handle things. And then they do it.

5) Jimi Hendrix: You'd think that with Hendrix dying young and his people releasing dozens of questionably legit albums that they'd find at least one inappropriate piece of half-realized crap to bestow an award on. (Remember, you can't win for the good stuff!) They could even let Jimi win for "Best Vocal Performance" and completely ignore his guitar playing. Or maybe he could win something for "Best Album with inappropriate overdubs."

4) Al Green: He didn't start winning Grammys until 1981. Now they know who he is. But Green's most productive time was the entire decade before. He was the man. But just keep repeating things like Voodoo Lounge in your head and it all makes complete and perfect sense. You must admit, the Academy has been consistent.

3) The Beatles: They won a Grammy for "Free As A Bird." They were the Best New Artist of 1964 and Sgt. Pepper's won Album of the Year for 1967, but nothing for Revolver? Nothing for so many other things. But "Free As A Bird." I guess, like the Rolling Stones, the Beatles needed to stay together longer than necessary if they were going to start getting their just due. Imagine the horrible albums they could've made in the late 1970s if they'd put their minds to it.

2) Marvin Gaye: While Stevie Wonder had his contributions to R&B well noted, Marvin Gaye received no such luck. Nothing for "Ain't No Mountain High Enough" or "I Heard It Through The Grapevine" or What's Goin' On or even Let's Get It On. No, they waited until 1982. Better late than never, I guess. And when they finally give him the Grammy, they give him one for his vocal performance and then one for the instrumental version of the song, suggesting what? They like the song just as much if he doesn't sing on it? Could give a guy a complex that way.

1) The Rolling Stones: According to the website, the Rolling Stones have won two Grammys in their career. One is for "Love Is Strong" as Best Music Video, Short Form, 1994 and the other is for Voodoo Lounge, as Best Rock Album, 1994. I don't think I have to do much explaining here. I haven't actually met anyone who likes Voodoo Lounge, but I run in some pretty uptight circles. However, the idea that they'd previously been snubbed for three decades seems a tad excessive. If the Academy wanted to get it wrong, they could've started handing the group awards around the time of, say, It's Only Rock N' Roll. They didn't have to wait another two decades. What? Dirty Work wasn't bad enough to qualify? Sheesh. 

41 Comments

1. house -
the rolling stones were by far the greatest band in the world - at least until brian jones died. since that time, they've been a shell of their former selves. "between the buttons" is perhaps the most underrated album of all time.

2. Reg -
well spoken, sir. I might add that Luther Vandross never one before his pop success.

3. ws -
Haven't you realized that the grammys are nothing but bull [profane]?

4. Gerry -
I second bighouseeman's opinion of BETWEEN THE BUTTONS. It's the Stones' best, and the one that usually gets overlooked the most.
If the 'Academy' had real guts and taste, they would have given Otis Redding an Album Of The Year Grammy for OTIS BLUE, instead of waiting for him to be conveniently dead to toss one at him in 1968.
And for someone who never won a Grammy, posthumously or otherwise, make mine Love for their 1967 masterpiece FOREVER CHANGES, as well as for turning Elektra into a rock label nine months before The Doors released their debut.

5. CK -
Just the fact that the top four bands of all time are on your list, should cause any recording artist who gets a grammy to wonder if the academy has just told them that they really suck. The grammys are a celebration of the mundane, but they do give you a good idea of who you will find in the $2 bin at your used CD store in a few months.

6. Yahoo! Music User -
I'm a drummer, bin doin it for 11 years. Where's the punk and metal??!!!

7. Sean -
I'm sure all of these artists deal with this is by thinking of Groucho Marx's oft-quoted opinion that "he wouldn't belong to any club that would have him as a member".

Grammys. Little wonder they're named after something old, late, and incredibly unhip.

8. __A_YAHOO_USER__ -
WS, have you realized that he DOESN'T?

Historylover10, Led Zeppelin is metal. Way to go.



Rob, these are good choices. But I say this:

Where is Rush?


Hahahaha! If anyone has been reading this blog long enough, they'll know the joke!

9. Chris the first -
Leave up to the Grammy voters to hand out awards to most uninspiring artists. Most Grammy winner's music makes me wanna fall sleep.

10. grATTITUDE -
If Neil Young cared, I'd throw him a bone.

11. Abbigail -
I think if I was an artist, I wouldn't want to win a Grammy. It's like winning the "honorable mention" award in a contest that has a money prize. Means nothing, in other words, and you don't get crap.

12. Neal R -
Eddie Veder got it right

13. tom -
grATTITUDE has it right. If there were more artists like Neil Young there would be fewer awards like The Grammies. Artists looking for awards is too close to prostitution. From the Bee Gees to Rush, from Rick Wakeman to Graham Parker if you like their sound buy the music. If you don't, don't. If someone pulls up next to you with something offesive adn loud playing in their car, shoot or mace them.

14. Yahoo! Music User -
NON-WINNER: NEIL YOUNG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

15. Cat lo-lo -
It's all a big popularity contest, everyone knows that. Award shows are excuses for the rich and famous to slap themselves on the back and say "you're great, we should work together"......blah blah blah blah blah. It cheapens the music.

16. Yahoo! Music User -
hey D33ppurple you got a prob with Rush?

17. Walt -
Who do you have have to pay to get nominated. in 72 The Late Great Rory Gallagher wasvoted best guitarist that year but since he played the blues with all the finess of any Blues Masters he bought his strat in the 60's it was special ordered and shipped to Ireland and not picked up by the purchaser It is said to be the only strat ion Ireland at the time If you were to speak no listen to his work after his Band by the name of Taste you will realize he was a blues player of Master Class ability and he has 2 albums out from that era Irish Tour and Live From Europe and youi will see how pure his playing captured the essence of yje Deltal Blues mem and the Chicago Style Rory deservers Hall of

18. Giants Nutcase -
So let me get this straight. Between The Doors, Beatles, Stones, Who, Zeppelin, Janis, Pink Floyd, Marvin Gaye, and Hendrix, there are a measly eight Grammies awarded, while a second rate fraud like Cheryl Crow has nine by herself. What a joke!

19. __A_YAHOO_USER__ -
hey D33ppurple you got a prob with Rush?

----------------------------------------------

Not at all. The joke is that in the last few List of the Day blogs, someone has said "Where is Rush". So I took it upon my self to keep up this noble tradition.

20. LindaF -
I love The Stones, and they shoud be on the list!
I must also agree with D333PPURPLE~~~Where the heck is RUSH?
Hollywood, it's just a game!!!
Page:  1 | 2 | 3 
Leave Your Comment
You must sign in to leave a comment
Select a Blog Posts
New This Week
by Dave DiMartino
123
Reality Bites
by Jordan Gracey
38
Reality Rocks
by Lyndsey Parker
579
Rock's Backpages
by Philip Norman (1970)
191
Sound Check
by Yahoo! Music Canada
27
Stop The Presses!
by Us Magazine
85
That's Really Week
by Lyndsey Parker
124
The Blender Burner
by Blender Magazine
27
The MOJO Blog
by Bill DeMain
88
The NME Blog
by Luke Lewis
48
The Spin Blog
by David Marchese
77
The Ten
by Andy West
9
Video Ga Ga
by Lyndsey Parker
70

Lambert says he got carried away, but not sorry

AP
Wed Nov 25, 2009 11:00am PST

AP - Adam Lambert admits he got carried away with his sexually charged American Music Awards performance, but he's offering no apology. The glam rocker from "American Idol" said on "The Early Show" t… More »

More News Stories